|
|
In wartime, some people are punished by dying; others are punished by surviving. Still others muddle through the fog of war taking their best guess amid chaos and act accordingly. Based on the 2002 novel by Joseph Kanon, director Steven Soderbergh scores a direct hit with this drama of lies, betrayal, murder, love, self-interest, and international intrigue in post World War II Berlin. The film may be black and white but the issues are less so. Secrets, moral ambiguities and tough choices litter the minefield. George Clooney and Cate Blanchett are in fine form as a pair of former lovers who meet again when American journalist Jacob Geismer (Clooney) returns to Germany to cover the peace talks at Potsdam in 1945. Lena (Blanchett) has been reduced to turning tricks for both the winning and the losing sides, but the suggestion of a larger agenda looms from the first grainy sequence. Her missing scientist husband is being sought by all sides, though none admit to having an interest in him, and the seeds of the cold war are sprouting in many directions. It is good cinematic story telling at its best in the tradition of The Third Man and A Foreign Affair. Using archival footage of war torn streets, triumphant military parades, newsreels of Eisenhower, Churchill and Stalin, with the backdrop of war ravaged Germany, Soderbergh evokes the mood of the period better than any film in recent memory. The washed-out background visuals and dark interiors suggest the sharp contrast between what appeared in the newspapers and the political and personal struggles still raging after the shooting stopped. The visual style closely mimics late 1940’s filmmaking but manages to avoid
parody. Though grousers may find Soderbergh’s vision derivative and some
elements of the production design could be described as lifted directly from
The Third Man, a century of movie making finds little that does not have its
roots in what came before. Is the title an oxymoron or an affirmation? Did being on the winning side insure that the Allied forces would make moral choices after the war? Are human scientific minds commodities to capture and own? The film reveals an environment where efforts to track down Nazi criminals overlap with the conflicting goals of military and political positioning, not to mention re-building Europe. I did not read the novel and suspect that as usual, much is left out, but Soderbergh’s finished product does justice to the personal and the political narrative. From the opening credits in the unencumbered 1940’s style, Soderbergh
sustains an unmistakable mood. This is due somewhat to the black and white but
even more to a sure cinematic sense. The soundtrack aids rather than overwhelms
and the voiceover narration from several characters lends thematic balance.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||